![rise of nations best nation rise of nations best nation](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/81Iky-YDB+L._SL1500_.jpg)
But in the economic sphere the best way in which nations can serve the global good is by putting their own economic house in order. Global governance remains crucial in some areas, for example climate change or health pandemics, where the provision of global public goods is essential. If economic policies fail, they most often do so for domestic not international reasons. The conventional picture of the world economy as a ‘global commons’ – one in which all nations would be driven to economic ruin unless they cooperate – is misleading. The globalist worldview is grounded in the argument that an interconnected world economy requires collective action at the global level. As we’ve all seen, elite globalism also opens political paths for Right-wing populists to hijack patriotism for destructive ends. Our elites’ and technocrats’ obsession with globalism weakens citizenship where it is most needed – at home – and makes it more difficult to achieve economic prosperity, financial stability, social inclusion and other desirable objectives. When it comes to providing the arrangements that markets rely on, the nation-state remains the only effective actor, the only game in town. Markets need regulatory and legitimising institutions to thrive – consumer-safety rules, bank regulations, central banks, social insurance and so on. ‘If you believe you’re a citizen of the world,’ she said, ‘you’re a citizen of nowhere.’ Last October, the British prime minister Theresa May ignited an outcry when she disparaged the idea of global citizenship. Economists and centrist politicians tend to view globalism’s recent setbacks as regrettable, fuelled by populist and nativist politicians who managed to capitalise on the grievances of those who feel they have been left behind and deserted by the globalist elites. Most often, it is regarded as ineffectual – morally irrelevant, or even reactionary – in the face of the challenges posed by globalisation. Without a shift, we might find not only our open global economy, but also our liberal, democratic order swept away by the backlash wrought by the blind spots and excesses of this mindset.Īmong the intelligentsia, the nation-state finds few advocates. Proposed remedies among mainstream thought leaders rarely go beyond an invocation of the problem of inequality, and a bit more focus on compensating the losers.īut the problem lies deeper, in elites’ attachment to a globalist mindset that underplays and weakens the nation-state. Yet the intellectual consensus that brought us to this chasm remains intact. These two groups now live in parallel social worlds and orient themselves using different cognitive maps.
#Rise of nations best nation professional
The populist revolt of our day reflects the deep rift that has opened between the worldview of the global intellectual and professional elites, and that of ordinary citizens.